Microbial Ecology & Molecular EvolutionThe following questions pertain to the Goffredi, et al (2004) study:
Goffredi SK, Waren A, Orphan VJ, Van Dover CL, Vrijenhoek RC (2004) Novel forms of structural integration between microbes and a hydrothermal vent gastropod from the Indian Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 3082-0390.
1) What is the purpose or goal of this study
2) Find the hypothesis(es) tested in the study and re-phrase
it (them) as a conditional proposition (i.e., “If. . . then. . .”
statement).
3) Do the results support or refute the hypothesis(es) for
the study
4) Identify and briefly explain the key result that enabled
you to draw the conclusion stated in question #3 (If there was more
than one hypothesis, then there will likely be more than one result
to discuss – specify which result addressed which hypothesis).
5) Based on your own evaluation of the data, do you agree
with the conclusions of the authors of the study Why or why not
Identify problems or ambiguities in their results that lead you to
question their analysis.
6) Thinking about future directions. . . Suggest one
experiment the authors of the study should do next as a follow-up
to this study.
"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"
Microbial Ecology & Molecular EvolutionThe following questions pertain to the Goffredi, et al (2004) study:
Goffredi SK, Waren A, Orphan VJ, Van Dover CL, Vrijenhoek RC (2004) Novel forms of structural integration between microbes and a hydrothermal vent gastropod from the Indian Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 3082-0390.
1) What is the purpose or goal of this study
2) Find the hypothesis(es) tested in the study and re-phrase
it (them) as a conditional proposition (i.e., “If. . . then. . .”
statement).
3) Do the results support or refute the hypothesis(es) for
the study
4) Identify and briefly explain the key result that enabled
you to draw the conclusion stated in question #3 (If there was more
than one hypothesis, then there will likely be more than one result
to discuss – specify which result addressed which hypothesis).
5) Based on your own evaluation of the data, do you agree
with the conclusions of the authors of the study Why or why not
Identify problems or ambiguities in their results that lead you to
question their analysis.
6) Thinking about future directions. . . Suggest one
experiment the authors of the study should do next as a follow-up
to this study.
"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"
Microbial Ecology & Molecular EvolutionThe following questions pertain to the Goffredi, et al (2004) study:
Goffredi SK, Waren A, Orphan VJ, Van Dover CL, Vrijenhoek RC (2004) Novel forms of structural integration between microbes and a hydrothermal vent gastropod from the Indian Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 3082-0390.
1) What is the purpose or goal of this study
2) Find the hypothesis(es) tested in the study and re-phrase
it (them) as a conditional proposition (i.e., “If. . . then. . .”
statement).
3) Do the results support or refute the hypothesis(es) for
the study
4) Identify and briefly explain the key result that enabled
you to draw the conclusion stated in question #3 (If there was more
than one hypothesis, then there will likely be more than one result
to discuss – specify which result addressed which hypothesis).
5) Based on your own evaluation of the data, do you agree
with the conclusions of the authors of the study Why or why not
Identify problems or ambiguities in their results that lead you to
question their analysis.
6) Thinking about future directions. . . Suggest one
experiment the authors of the study should do next as a follow-up
to this study.
"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"
Microbial Ecology & Molecular EvolutionThe following questions pertain to the Goffredi, et al (2004) study:
Goffredi SK, Waren A, Orphan VJ, Van Dover CL, Vrijenhoek RC (2004) Novel forms of structural integration between microbes and a hydrothermal vent gastropod from the Indian Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 3082-0390.
1) What is the purpose or goal of this study
2) Find the hypothesis(es) tested in the study and re-phrase
it (them) as a conditional proposition (i.e., “If. . . then. . .”
statement).
3) Do the results support or refute the hypothesis(es) for
the study
4) Identify and briefly explain the key result that enabled
you to draw the conclusion stated in question #3 (If there was more
than one hypothesis, then there will likely be more than one result
to discuss – specify which result addressed which hypothesis).
5) Based on your own evaluation of the data, do you agree
with the conclusions of the authors of the study Why or why not
Identify problems or ambiguities in their results that lead you to
question their analysis.
6) Thinking about future directions. . . Suggest one
experiment the authors of the study should do next as a follow-up
to this study.
